Is Red Light Therapy The Same As Infrared?

Ever hear "red light therapy" and "infrared therapy" used interchangeably and wonder if they're just different names for the same thing? It's confusing, and plenty of marketing buzzwords don't help clear the picture.

No, they aren't identical. While often grouped together and used in combination, red light and near-infrared (NIR) light are distinct parts of the light spectrum with different wavelengths and penetration depths. ¹ Think of them as related tools, not the same tool.

Red and Near-Infrared light occupy distinct places on the spectrum.

It's a common point of confusion, even within the wellness industry. Both fall under the umbrella of "photobiomodulation," but their specific properties mean they interact with the body differently. As veterans in the LED light therapy game at REDDOT LED, where we manufacture devices using both types of light, let's shed some light (pun intended!) on the key differences and similarities.

Which is better, infrared or red light therapy?

You see devices offering red light, others offering infrared, and some offering both. It begs the question – is one superior? Which one should you prioritize for your needs?

Neither is inherently "better"; they target different depths. ^{1 2} Red light (like 660nm) is superb for skin surface issues (wrinkles, tone), while Near-Infrared (like 850nm) penetrates deeper, ideal for muscles, joints, and potentially deeper tissues.

Red light targets the skin; Near-Infrared reaches deeper tissues.

Thinking one is simply "better" misses the point – it's about picking the right tool for the job. Here's a breakdown:

Depth and Targets:

• Red Light (e.g., 630nm, 660nm):
  • Wavelength: Shorter visible light wavelengths.
  • Penetration: Absorbed primarily within the skin layers (epidermis and dermis). ^{1 2}
  • Best For: Skin rejuvenation (stimulating collagen , reducing wrinkles, improving tone), wound healing, hair growth stimulation, addressing superficial scars. ^{2 3}
• Near-Infrared (NIR) Light (e.g., 810nm, 830nm, 850nm):
  • Wavelength: Longer, invisible wavelengths just beyond visible red.
  • Penetration: Can reach deeper into the body – through the skin into subcutaneous tissue, muscle, joints, and even potentially bone. ^{1 2}
  • Best For: Muscle recovery, reducing joint pain and inflammation, improving circulation in deeper tissues, potentially aiding nerve function and deeper tissue repair. ^{2 4}

The Power of Combination:

Many high-quality devices, including customizable options from REDDOT LED, offer both red and NIR wavelengths. This combination approach provides benefits at multiple depths simultaneously – addressing skin health Und deeper tissue concerns in one session.

So, "better" depends entirely on your primary goal. Skin focus? Red is key. Deeper tissues? NIR is crucial. Often, a combination device offers the most versatile benefits.

Is far red light the same as infrared light?

You might hear terms like "far-red" and "infrared" and wonder if they're synonyms, adding another layer of confusion to the wavelength puzzle. Are they just different ways of saying the same thing?

No, "far-red" and "infrared" are distinct, though adjacent on the spectrum. Far-red (~700-750nm) is the very edge of visible red light, while infrared (>750nm) is invisible. ¹ Near-Infrared (NIR, ~750-1400nm) is typically used in therapy, distinct from Far Infrared (FIR, >3000nm) used in saunas.

Far-Red, Near-Infrared, and Far-Infrared are different wavelength categories.

Let's untangle these terms:

• Visible Red Light: Roughly 620nm to 700nm. This is the red light we can see, commonly used for skin benefits (e.g., 660nm).
• Far-Red Light: Approximately 700nm to 750nm. It's right at the edge of what humans can barely perceive as red. It shares some properties with red light but starts to penetrate slightly deeper. Sometimes grouped with red or NIR in discussions.
• Near-Infrared (NIR) Light: Approximately 750nm to 1400nm. This is invisible light and the type most commonly referred to as "infrared" in the context of LED therapy panels and masks (e.g., 810nm, 830nm, 850nm). It penetrates deeper than red light. ^{1 2} This is the "infrared" typically paired with red light in therapy devices.

What is another name for red light therapy?

You might see research papers or clinical discussions using different terminology, making you wonder if "red light therapy" is just a layman's term for something more technical.

Yes, other common names include Photobiomodulation (PBM) and Low-Level Light Therapy (LLLT) or Low-Level Laser Therapy. ^{1 6} "Photobiomodulation" is often preferred in scientific contexts as it accurately describes the process: using light (photo) to modulate (modulate) biological (bio) processes.

PBM and LLLT are more technical terms for red light therapy.

While "red light therapy" is the most consumer-friendly term, understanding the others can be helpful:

• Photobiomodulation (PBM): This is arguably the most accurate scientific term. It encompasses the use of non-ionizing light sources, including lasers and LEDs, in the visible (like red) and near-infrared spectrum to stimulate healing, reduce inflammation, and promote regeneration non-thermally. ⁶ It highlights the biological effect of the light.

Is red light therapy LED or laser?

Looking at different devices, you might encounter both LED and laser technologies being mentioned. Are home panels using the same powerful lasers found in clinics?

Most commercially available red light therapy devices for home use, like panels and masks, utilize light-emitting diodes (LEDs). ^{1 7} While lasers can be used for photobiomodulation (often called low-level laser therapy), they are typically found in clinical settings due to higher cost, focused beams, and safety considerations.

Home devices primarily use LEDs; lasers are usually clinical tools.

Both LEDs and lasers can emit therapeutic wavelengths of red and NIR light, but they differ significantly in their characteristics and application:

LED vs. Laser:

Why LEDs Dominate Home Use: LEDs offer a safer, more affordable way to cover larger areas of the body evenly, which is perfect for typical home therapy sessions targeting skin, muscles, or general wellness. Their diffused light and lower power density make them inherently safer for non-professional users. REDDOT LED, for example, focuses on high-quality LED technology for its panels, masks, and other devices, ensuring they meet safety standards like MDSAP/FDA/CE/ETL.

While LLLT (using lasers) is a valid therapy, the device you buy for home use is almost certainly LED-based.

What are the downsides of red light therapy?

It sounds promising, but are there any catches? Before investing time and money, it's smart to understand the potential drawbacks or limitations of red light therapy.

Downsides are generally minor and rare: potential temporary skin redness or tightness, mild eye strain if protection isn't used, the time commitment required for consistency, and the cost of quality devices. ^{7 8} It's not a guaranteed cure-all, and effectiveness varies.

While RLT boasts a strong safety profile, ⁸ it's not without potential considerations:

• Minor, Temporary Side Effects: Some users might experience slight, temporary redness, warmth, or skin tightness immediately after a session, which usually fades quickly. Overly long or close sessions could theoretically cause mild, superficial burns, but this is rare with proper use of quality LED devices.
• Eye Sensitivity/Strain: The lights are bright! Staring directly at LEDs, especially NIR which is invisible but still bright, can cause discomfort or temporary visual spots. Using appropriate eye protection is crucial, especially for facial treatments. ⁷
• Time Commitment: RLT isn't a quick fix. Seeing results requires consistent sessions (e.g., 10-20 minutes, several times per week) over weeks or months. It demands patience and routine.
• Cost of Quality: Effective, certified devices aren't cheap. While potentially cost-effective long-term compared to professional treatments, the upfront investment can be significant. Beware of suspiciously cheap devices lacking proper specs or certifications.
• Not a Panacea: RLT can be very beneficial for supported conditions (skin, pain, inflammation), but it doesn't work for everything or for everyone. Results can vary based on the individual, the condition, device quality, and usage consistency.

Abschluss

Red light and near-infrared light are distinct therapies, targeting different depths – skin and deeper tissues, respectively. ^{1 2} Often called PBM or LLLT, ⁶ home devices predominantly use safe, effective LEDs. ⁷ While generally very safe, ⁸ minor downsides exist like cost and time commitment.

References